Todd’s Life

I am currently reading “Human Action” by Ludwig von Mises, a brilliant economist who understood IT.  I’m going to share with you some things that I read from him as often as I can.  I’ll cite him.  If you have a chance, I’d suggest picking up any book by him.  He will provide you the tools to fight those who wish to fight freedom by dissecting their arguments and teaching you to understand the fallacy of security.  There is no security in the world today.  It’s been that way from the beginning.  I wish that Americans would stop and think about what President Obama and the Democrats are proposing.  They are in effect saying that the government can manage health care better than the market.  If that is the case, then why don’t we let the government manage everything and why don’t we just become communist.  Of course most people see the lunacy in that, but to accept Obama’s argument is to basically admit that the market economy and the freedom it entails does not work and so we must choose the government and its police powers to manage our economy.  The best we can hope for is liberty.  Anyway, here is what he said on page 287 about the Inequality of Wealth and Income.

“The inequality of individuals with regard to wealth and income is an essential feature of the market economy.”
 
“The fact that freedom is incompatible with equality of wealth and income has been stressed by many authors.  There is no need to enter into an examination of the emotional arguments advanced in these writings.  Neither is it necessary to raise the question of whether the renunciation of liberty could in itself guarantee the establishment of equality of wealth and income and whether or not a society could subsists on the basis of such equality.  Our task is merely to describe the role inequality plays in the framework of the market society.”

“In the market society direct compulsion and coercion are practiced only for the sake of preventing acts detrimental to social cooperation.  For the rest individuals are not molested by the police power.  The law-abiding citizen is free from the interference of jailers and hangmen.  What pressure is needed to impel an individual to contribute his share to the cooperative effort of production is exercised by the price structure of the market.  This pressure is indirect.  It puts on each individual’s contribution a premium graduated according to the value which the consumers attach to this contribution.  In rewarding the individual’s efforts according to its value, it leaves to everybody the choice between a more or less complete utilization of his own faculties and abilities.  This method cannot, of course, eliminate the disadvantages of inherent personal inferiority.  But it provides an incentive to everybody to exert his faculties and abilities to the utmost.”

“The only alternative to this financial pressure as exercised by the market is direct pressure and compulsion as exercised by the police power.  The authorities must be entrusted with the task of determining the quantity and quality of work that each individual is bound to perform.  As individuals are unequal with regard to their abilities, this requires an examination of their personalities on the part of the authorities.  The individual becomes an inmate of a penitentiary, as it were, to whom a definite task is assigned.  If he fails to achieve what the authorities have ordered him to do, he is liable to punishment.”

“It is important to realize in what the difference consists between direct pressure exercised for the prevention of crime and that exercised for the extortion of definite performance.  In the former case all that is required from the individual is to avoid a certain mode of conduct, precisely determined by law.  As a rule it is easy to establish whether or not this interdiction has been observed.  In the second case the individual is liable to accomplish a definite task; the law forces him toward an indefinite action, the determination of which is left to the decision of the executive power.  The individual is bound to obey whatever the administration orders him to do.  Whether or not the command is issued by the executive power was adequate to his forces and faculties and whether or not he has complied with it to the best of abilities is extremely difficult to establish.  Every citizen is with regard to all aspects of his personality and with regard to all manifestations of his conduct subject to the decisions of the authorities.  In the market economy in a trial before a penal court the prosecutor is obliged to produce sufficient evidence that the defendant is guilty.  But in matters of the performance of compulsory work it devolves upon the defendant to prove that the task assigned to him was beyond his abilities or that he has done all that can be expected of him.  The administrators combine in their persons the offices of the legislator, the executor of the law, the public prosecutor, and the judge.  The defendants are entirely at their mercy.  This is what people have in mind when speaking of lack of freedom.”

“No system of social division of labor can do without a method that makes individuals responsible for their contributions to the joint productive effort.  If this responsibility is not brought about the price structure of the market and the inequality of wealth and income it begets, it must be enforced by the methods of direct compulsion as practiced by the police.”